[ad_1]
I personally prefer the classic editor as it is easier for me to create post using it.
Also, I have better control over the design, and I can fine-tune the look of the site with the old editor. I tried the Gutenberg editor, and it broke some components in [my website]).
Which one do you prefer?
What are the pros and cons for each editor from your point of view?
[ad_2]
The Gutenberg editor makes my life easier as a developer and my writers’ lives easier. Stylized bits of content or complex related content queries become easily configurable and easily maintainable blocks. Users don’t have to worry about remembering or mistyping shortcodes, and block patterns act as macros of sorts. Writers also get a decent instant preview of what they’re doing.
Hmm, [second post like this in a few hours]). What’s the point of asking this? Everyone has their own preference. What difference does it make to you? Use what works for your workflow.
Classic Editor. My site is fairly complex with over 300 pages using different template parts in different sections of the site and I haven’t found anything that indicates this is easy to move into Gutenberg.