Hi guys, I’ve been seeing lots of positive comments about Gutenberg (for most of them, saying that it’s a better alternative to Elementor or the like mainly because of its better speed). However, when looking at the reviews of the Gutenberg plugin, it shows a completetely different pictures (see attached pic). Any idea why? Cheers
Most users aren’t going to leave a review on a plugin that’s no longer necessary to use Gutenberg, and those that do tend to be overwhelmingly negative no matter the product.
What /u/mrbmi513 said. It’s built-in now, so there’s no reason to review a plugin version of it.
Those reviews are mainly left by people who were (or who still are) salty over having to use the block editor for posts. The TinyMCE fans are hella vocal and really, really, _really_ hate change.